The P/E ratio measures how cheaply valued a company’s stock price is by dividing the current stock price to its earnings-per-share (EPS). It indicates the dollar amount an investor can expect to invest in a company to receive $1 of that company’s earnings. Greenhill P/E ratio is 5.67. it has increased by a third in comparison to the same period last year. this metric is one of the most popular because it easily summarizes the status of the company. however, in order to make an informed decision, more metrics should be analysed. Let’s dive into Greenhill’s P/E ratio
What is Greenhill P/E Ratio?
Greenhill’s P/E ratio is 5.67, which represents a 166.16% increase over the same period last year. their average P / E ratio is -0.5 and their 5-year average is 3.86.
What is Greenhill Net EPS?
Greenhill’s net profit from the most recent quarter was $1.53, which represents a 38.8% decrease from the same period last year.
Who are Greenhill Competitors?
Based on Jika.io AI model, Cinda International Holdings, Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings, Styland Holdings, CASH Financial Services Group, Southwest Securities International Securities, Roma Group, Bridgewater Bancshares, Numis are considered to be Greenhill’s competitors because the companies operate within the same industry as Greenhill and they are targeting the same customer base. in addition, competitors typically share a similar market capitalization as Greenhill.
Who is Greenhill’s Biggest competitor?
Greenhill’s biggest competitor is Cinda International Holdings, based on the Jika.io AI model. it has a similar market capitalization to Greenhill in the industry, it dominates a similar share of the market as Greenhill, and it provides and markets very similar services.
What industry is Greenhill in?
Greenhill is part of the Capital Markets and Financial Services industry.
Greenhill vs Cinda International Holdings
Market Cap: Greenhill’s Market Cap of 157004928 is lower than Cinda International Holdings Market Cap of 259648800.
Average Volume: Greenhill’s Average Volume of 298998.0 is lower than Cinda International Holdings Average Volume of 57559.0.
Beta: Greenhill’s Beta of 0.92 is higher than Cinda International Holdings Beta of 0.35.
Revenue: Greenhill’s Revenue of 317.539M is higher than Cinda International Holdings Revenue of 205.152M.
Net Income: Greenhill’s Net Income of 42.312M is lower than Cinda International Holdings Net Income of 57.794M.
Gross Profit: Greenhill’s Gross Profit of 126.993M is lower than Cinda International Holdings Gross Profit of 79.041M.
Ebitda: Greenhill’s Ebitda of 76.049M is higher than Cinda International Holdings Ebitda of 119.979M.
P/E Ratio: Greenhill’s P/E Ratio of 8.84 is higher than Cinda International Holdings P/E Ratio of 4.44.
P/S Ratio: Greenhill’s P/S Ratio of 0.54 is lower than Cinda International Holdings P/S Ratio of 0.99.
P/B Ratio: Greenhill’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is higher than Cinda International Holdings P/B Ratio of 0.25.
P/FCF Ratio: Greenhill’s P/FCF Ratio of 1.48 is higher than Cinda International Holdings P/FCF Ratio of -17.73.
ROE: Greenhill’s ROE of 0.34 is higher than Cinda International Holdings ROE of 0.05.
ROA: Greenhill’s ROA of 0.05 is higher than Cinda International Holdings ROA of 0.02.
Return On Capital Employed: Greenhill’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.11 is higher than Cinda International Holdings Return On Capital Employed of 0.01.
Gross Profit Margin: Greenhill’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is lower than Cinda International Holdings Gross Profit Margin of 0.6.
Assets (Total): Greenhill’s Assets (Total) of 568.632M is higher than Cinda International Holdings Assets (Total) of 2.106B.
Debt (Total): Greenhill’s Debt (Total) of 360.531M is lower than Cinda International Holdings Debt (Total) of 798.874M.
Greenhill vs Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings
Market Cap: Greenhill’s Market Cap of 157004928 is lower than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Market Cap of 237377728.
Average Volume: Greenhill’s Average Volume of 298998.0 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Average Volume of 103232.0.
Beta: Greenhill’s Beta of 0.92 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Beta of 0.26.
Revenue: Greenhill’s Revenue of 317.539M is lower than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Revenue of 90.017M.
Net Income: Greenhill’s Net Income of 42.312M is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Net Income of 31.758M.
Gross Profit: Greenhill’s Gross Profit of 126.993M is lower than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Gross Profit of 81.491M.
Ebitda: Greenhill’s Ebitda of 76.049M is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Ebitda of 49.973M.
P/E Ratio: Greenhill’s P/E Ratio of 8.84 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings P/E Ratio of -5.52.
P/S Ratio: Greenhill’s P/S Ratio of 0.54 is lower than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings P/S Ratio of 2.0.
P/B Ratio: Greenhill’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings P/B Ratio of 0.23.
P/FCF Ratio: Greenhill’s P/FCF Ratio of 1.48 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings P/FCF Ratio of -2.69.
ROE: Greenhill’s ROE of 0.34 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings ROE of -0.04.
ROA: Greenhill’s ROA of 0.05 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings ROA of -0.02.
Return On Capital Employed: Greenhill’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.11 is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Return On Capital Employed of 0.0.
Gross Profit Margin: Greenhill’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is lower than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Gross Profit Margin of 0.94.
Assets (Total): Greenhill’s Assets (Total) of 568.632M is higher than Sunwah Kingsway Capital Holdings Assets (Total) of 1.975B.
Greenhill vs Styland Holdings
Market Cap: Greenhill’s Market Cap of 157004928 is higher than Styland Holdings Market Cap of 80015688.
Average Volume: Greenhill’s Average Volume of 298998.0 is higher than Styland Holdings Average Volume of 1.104M.
Beta: Greenhill’s Beta of 0.92 is lower than Styland Holdings Beta of 1.37.
Revenue: Greenhill’s Revenue of 317.539M is lower than Styland Holdings Revenue of 47.009M.
Net Income: Greenhill’s Net Income of 42.312M is higher than Styland Holdings Net Income of -38.895M.
Gross Profit: Greenhill’s Gross Profit of 126.993M is lower than Styland Holdings Gross Profit of 43.09M.
Ebitda: Greenhill’s Ebitda of 76.049M is higher than Styland Holdings Ebitda of -23.532M.
P/E Ratio: Greenhill’s P/E Ratio of 8.84 is higher than Styland Holdings P/E Ratio of -0.95.
P/S Ratio: Greenhill’s P/S Ratio of 0.54 is lower than Styland Holdings P/S Ratio of 1.21.
P/B Ratio: Greenhill’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is higher than Styland Holdings P/B Ratio of 0.14.
P/FCF Ratio: Greenhill’s P/FCF Ratio of 1.48 is lower than Styland Holdings P/FCF Ratio of 12.05.
ROE: Greenhill’s ROE of 0.34 is higher than Styland Holdings ROE of -0.14.
ROA: Greenhill’s ROA of 0.05 is higher than Styland Holdings ROA of -0.08.
Return On Capital Employed: Greenhill’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.11 is higher than Styland Holdings Return On Capital Employed of -0.08.
Gross Profit Margin: Greenhill’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is lower than Styland Holdings Gross Profit Margin of 0.95.
Assets (Total): Greenhill’s Assets (Total) of 568.632M is lower than Styland Holdings Assets (Total) of 825.529M.
Debt (Total): Greenhill’s Debt (Total) of 360.531M is higher than Styland Holdings Debt (Total) of 256.258M.
Shareholders Equity: Greenhill’s Shareholders Equity of 104.935M is lower than Styland Holdings Shareholders Equity of 470.321M.
Greenhill vs CASH Financial Services Group
Market Cap: Greenhill’s Market Cap of 157004928 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group Market Cap of 87493632.
Average Volume: Greenhill’s Average Volume of 298998.0 is lower than CASH Financial Services Group Average Volume of 470061.0.
Beta: Greenhill’s Beta of 0.92 is lower than CASH Financial Services Group Beta of 1.15.
Revenue: Greenhill’s Revenue of 317.539M is lower than CASH Financial Services Group Revenue of 96.863M.
Net Income: Greenhill’s Net Income of 42.312M is higher than CASH Financial Services Group Net Income of -53.47M.
Gross Profit: Greenhill’s Gross Profit of 126.993M is lower than CASH Financial Services Group Gross Profit of 13.558M.
Ebitda: Greenhill’s Ebitda of 76.049M is higher than CASH Financial Services Group Ebitda of -37.413M.
P/E Ratio: Greenhill’s P/E Ratio of 8.84 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group P/E Ratio of 101.52.
P/S Ratio: Greenhill’s P/S Ratio of 0.54 is lower than CASH Financial Services Group P/S Ratio of 0.77.
P/B Ratio: Greenhill’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group P/B Ratio of 0.21.
P/FCF Ratio: Greenhill’s P/FCF Ratio of 1.48 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group P/FCF Ratio of -0.93.
ROE: Greenhill’s ROE of 0.34 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group ROE of -0.26.
ROA: Greenhill’s ROA of 0.05 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group ROA of -0.09.
Return On Capital Employed: Greenhill’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.11 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group Return On Capital Employed of -0.2.
Gross Profit Margin: Greenhill’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is higher than CASH Financial Services Group Gross Profit Margin of 0.01.
Assets (Total): Greenhill’s Assets (Total) of 568.632M is higher than CASH Financial Services Group Assets (Total) of 1.296B.
About Greenhill
Greenhill & Co., Inc., an independent investment bank, provides financial and strategic advisory services to corporations, partnerships, institutional investors and governments worldwide. the company offers advisory services related to mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, financings, private capital raising and other similar transactions. it also advises clients on strategic matters, including activist shareholder protection, special committee projects, licensing deals and joint ventures, valuation, negotiation tactics, industry dynamics, structuring alternatives, timing and pricing of transactions, as well as financing alternatives. in addition, the company provides restructuring advisory services to debtors, creditors, governments and other stakeholders, and acquirers of distressed companies and assets, and advice on restructuring alternatives, capital structures, and sales or recapitalizations. furthermore, it assists clients in identifying and leveraging incremental sources of value, and in reorganizations supported by court, by developing and seeking approval for reorganization plans, as well as the implementation of such plans. in addition, the company advises on private placements of debt and structured equity, refinancing existing debt facilities, negotiating the modification and amendment of covenants, and acts as an independent advisor. it also provides financial advisory services to pension funds, endowments and other institutional investors on transactions involving alternative assets, and advice to fund sponsors of alternative assets for private capital raising, financing, restructuring, liquidity options, valuation and related services. the company was founded in 1996 and is based in New York, New York.
